Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Connor Farren vs Yankel Zemel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Farren vs Zemel analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Connor Farren vs Yankel Zemel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Farren 2 - 0 Zemel
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Farren has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Zemel has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Farren, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zemel has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Farren has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zemel has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Farren has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Zemel winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Farren has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 191/ 191), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 20% (W/L 2/ 8). Zemel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 124/ 107), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Farren winning 2 times and Zemel being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Farren winning 4 and Zemel winning 0. The last match between Farren and Zemel was at the Israel F5 (Akko), 03-05-2017, First, Hard with Connor Farren getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:32:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Farren and Zemel have played a deciding set 0 times, with Farren winning 0 times and Zemel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Farren winning 0, and Zemel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Farren has played against opponents with an average rank of while Zemel has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Farren has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zemel has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Farren has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zemel has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
894
Rank
685
High
29
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
L
Plays
Form
48% (200-214)
Career Total W/L
53% (129-115)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Connor Farren vs Yankel Zemel For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Farren VS Zemel
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Connor Farren | Yankel Zemel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 25 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 9 |
| DFs Total | 11 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:0 | 1:32:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (97/135) | 66% (69/105) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (62/97) | 58% (40/69) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (20/38) | 42% (15/36) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (9/12) | 33% (5/15) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (50/105) | 39% (53/135) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Connor Farren
Player
Yankel Zemel
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Connor Farren
Player
Yankel Zemel
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
0
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
1
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Connor Farren | Yankel Zemel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Connor Farren Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Connor Farren
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Connor Farren
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
47%
(
39 of
83)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Connor Farren
Player
Alexander Kotzen
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Connor Farren
Player
Braden Shick
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaimee Floyd Angele
Player
Connor Farren
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Connor Farren
Player
Rudy Quan
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Connor Farren
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
13
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Connor Farren
Player
Ivar Aramburu Contreras
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Connor Farren
42%
(
19 of
45)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
11
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
100%
(
19 of
19)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
A.j. Catanzariti
Player
Connor Farren
69%
(
66 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
4
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Yankel Zemel Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Brumm
Player
Yankel Zemel
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Jordan Hasson
Player
Yankel Zemel
46%
(
13 of
28)
1st Serve %
52%
(
15 of
29)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
11 of
13)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
12 of
15)
87%
(
13 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
35
Total Points Won
22
|
6-3 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yankel Zemel
Player
Niv Zuckerman
54%
(
55 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
9
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
51%
(
24 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
36 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
108
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(5) 6-0 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Aleksandr Lobanov
Player
Yankel Zemel
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Farren Vs Zemel Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Farren are available here and Zemel photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
